* Adam Matthew Publications. Imaginative publishers of research collections.
jbanks
News  |  Orders  |  About Us
*
*   A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z  
 

FOREIGN OFFICE FILES FOR POST-WAR EUROPE

Series One: The Schuman Plan and the European Coal and Steel Community

Part 1: 1950-1953

Part 2: 1954-1955

Part 3: 1956-1957

Publisher's Note

“FO 371 Files are the crucial UK source for the ‘insider’s view’ at the Foreign Office over the whole Schuman Plan and ECSC scheme, providing primary data and intelligence on the early years of operation.”
Dr Martin Dedman
School of Economics
Middlesex University

Within this microfilm collection of British Foreign Office Files can be found documents that relate directly to the fundamental questions of European co-operation and integration. The foundation of the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC) in April 1951 was the first significant move towards European Union, requiring countries to forsake a degree of national sovereignty and accept a supranational authority. Proposed by French Foreign Minister Robert Schuman and drafted by Jean Monnet, head of the French Planning Commission, it made clear from the outset its federal objectives:

“The pooling of coal and steel production will immediately provide for the establishment of common bases for economic development as a first step in the federation of Europe, and will change the destinies of those regions which have long been devoted to the munitions of war, of which they have been the most constant victims.”

These British Foreign Office Files, taken from Public Record Office Class FO 371, contain files covering all the major issues raised by the creation of the ECSC. As well as looking at the ramifications of the pooling of European coal and steel production, these documents investigate the wider issues stemming from this move for both Britain, and continental Europe, such as:

  • The reorganisation of the German coal, iron and steel industry, with special focus on the German steel cartels and the iron and steel works in the Soviet Occupied Zone
  • The relationship between the ECSC, OEEC and GATT, and the problems arising
  • British fears of being isolated in the move towards Western European integration, and Britain’s emphasis on maintaining close relations with America
  • British plans regarding Association with the Community
  • European Coal and Steel Community relations with trade unions
  • Observations on German and French views concerning the problems facing the ECSC
  • The development of Euratom and the possible co-operation in the field of nuclear energy

The ECSC Treaty was signed in Paris in 1951 by France, West Germany, Italy, Belgium, the Netherlands and Luxembourg. In part, the momentum developed for such an agreement reflected the influence of key people committed to some form of “common future” for Western Europe: Schuman and Monnet in France, Adenauer in West Germany, Alcide de Gàsperi and Carlo Sforza in Italy, Paul-Henri Spaak in Belgium, and Joseph Beck in Luxembourg. From 1951 onwards, it set the tone for renewed debate culminating in the establishment of the European Economic Community, a landmark reached in 1957. Britain, however, always preferring an inter-governmental rather than a federal approach, did not sign up, but nonetheless monitored the plan closely. The Foreign Office Files included in this collection contain the information and analysis that resulted from this monitoring.

The original draft of the Schuman Plan was the work of Jean Monnet, who certainly saw it as only the first step in a chain that would ultimately lead to the complete political and economic integration of Europe. Monnet became first president of the High Authority of the ECSC and remained in office until 1955, (when he was succeeded by René Mayer) during which time he continued to imprint his federalist creed upon the organisation. But what were the original motives of the French and the Germans for signing up to the Community? These papers allow scholars to study the aims and objectives of these two major players, and provide British interpretations of their actions and intentions. Key themes include:

  • French views on the Schuman Plan as the first step towards effective political integration
  • French desires for stability and union within Western Europe in the interests of national security, which they believed had to be based on a rapprochement between themselves and West Germany
  • Security issues and the balance of power in Europe. Although France was content for Germany to remain divided, the economic growth of West Germany following the major currency reforms of 1948 meant that France wanted to keep not just a political and military, but also an economic check, on her new neighbour
  • Economic advantages for France in a combined effort to grapple with the difficulties, experienced in several countries, pertaining particularly to coal and steel

Similarly West German motives can be assessed:

  • Her desire to rid herself of the economic restrictions of the international Ruhr Authority, and to regain sovereignty over the coal and steel producing Saar, which still remained in French hands
  • The new West German state’s aspirations for achieving equality in the international arena
  • Adenauer’s views and interests in integration to safeguard a better future and a more advantageous economic climate

The documents in this collection allow researchers to see the ECSC in operation, to witness the problems, to judge its achievements, and to investigate how it acted as a stimulus for greater European co-operation in the years from 1951-1957. In them can be found much information on the important groundwork which laid the foundations for the creation of the economic Common Market. There are also the first signs of Britain's continuing ambiguous relationship with Europe and the idea of integration. Although the United Kingdom decided to remain outside of the formal ECSC structure, she found it vital to maintain permanent delegations in Luxembourg accredited to the High Authority.


By 1958 the effects of the ECSC were being felt, much trade discrimination had been eliminated, production and volume of trade had greatly expanded and an impetus for further integration started. On the other hand there were problems; the ECSC constantly had to wrestle with national objections and intransigence; the French in particular continuing various policies and practices which infringed the terms of the treaty. Furthermore, no solution was found to stem coal over-production. Nevertheless, despite these difficulties, the ECSC set the agenda for further European integration, and remains a topic of central importance to any scholar wishing to understand the beginnings of the European Community, and the pressure to create a federal Europe.

Part 1 of this project covers the early years of the Schuman Plan from 1950 to 1953, and deals with the key issues facing the six countries who signed the treaty, as well as the implications of Britain’s decision to remain outside the organisation.

Part 2 deals with British attitudes to the Schuman Plan from 1954 to 1955, and looks at the continuing problems that the UK had in balancing her position as a European nation whilst upholding her Commonwealth obligations.

Part 3 covers the years 1956-1957 which saw the Community playing a defining role in the development of Europe, and the broadening of its interest into other areas such as nuclear power and relations with other organisations such as the UN and GATT.

“John Young’s recent historiography of Britain and Europe (in The Contemporary History Handbook edited by B Brivati, J Buxton and A Seldon) sets out a number of as yet unanswered questions about “one of the most significant debates for historians of post-war Britain”. It is clear that at least some of Young’s questions - and others which go beyond the British standpoint - can be more easily illuminated by the bringing together of the public records that are in this collection.”
Professor Elizabeth Meehan
Dean, Faculty of Economics and Social Science
The Queen’s University of Belfast

<back

 
 
 

* * *
   
* * *

* *© 2024 Adam Matthew Digital Ltd. All Rights Reserved.